Changing The Nature of Language Now Could Change Nature Forever

over 1 year ago (Edited)

My Revelation of Extant Changing to Languages In a Shared Contemporaneous Context Reveals a Methodology For Amplifying Widespread Disruption of Effective Communications.

Pandemic Aftermath: Understanding the Reveal Stage of the Pandemic Play – Are We Winning?

I read the above essay by writer Rusere Shoniwa yesterday to find that my messy and fracturing world view perspective could be cleaned up and pieced back together again. This essay expounds a monumental effort on behalf of Rusere, whose style and subject matter I would relate to more and more as the essay progressed.

It's left such a lasting impression on me that I had to emphasize how an essay so imbued with imagination and honesty, could improve my ability to communicate and help confirm that I was not alone in holding difficult-to-express world views.

I had a revelation at that moment, which was nothing to sneeze at. Nor was it something to face mask ones' face over as an instinctual response to public health communication challenges. Sneezing and/or face-masking being mentioned to you like this is me actively interfering with your decision-making abilities. And by me doing so, you could safely and unconsciously forget about it all, sidestepping your regular neural functions deftly.

Such is the potent force of imagination and honesty made available to you at that right time and place.
I recommended the essay to a friend, commenting that;

'It seems like we're not alone at all. There's a bunch of people from all walks of life converging into a required higher level of thinking (we gaining function?) to face the assault of sheer complexity.'

Out of the dozen or so critiques of The Atlantic's "Covid Pandemic Amnesty" article, a handful of them weren't just a emotive or overly turgid retort. In my heartfelt opinion Pandemic Aftermath: Understanding the Reveal Stage of the Pandemic Play – Are We Winning? was the best of the lot. It had everything I needed at the time I read it. It had a human characterization and voice running consistently through it. It had archaic and cognate usage of phrases, it had relevant sources cited, it had a variety of sources cited covering a wide spectrum of others' responses to the "Covid Pandemic Amnesty." Best of all, it had no obsessive stricture impeding it as being recognized by my mind and soul as being complete in itself; solid, whole and all the more formidable for it.

It lacked the excessive strictures of form, function and fact-checking which plagues the majority of contemporaneous texts today. No matter what type of format the text is or what it's intent was - you are a perception that can be nudged into communication challenges that result in extant changes to your conscious way of thinking. In other words, it lacked mind control.

Does that make sense?

Read on, my friend. I'm still learning how to reverse engineer Applied Psychology, Public Health Communication Generated Heuristics and a hidden lore which overwrites existing heuristics and decision-making neural pathways inside your brain. My working theory is that a mental/biological change in your brain can be induced via a tweaking of Hegel's Dialectic that amplifies it's Hermetic, alchemical subtext for reaction-generated neural mapping pathway challenges.

Axiomatic Heuristics ®

My placeholder term for this theory is Axiomatic Heuristics ®

The crux of it is that by exposure to texts and subtexts connected through specified pathways to super-nodal or sub-nodal hierarchies, your capacity to engage the decision-making cortex part of your brain reroutes via dialectical strictures. There's no cognition of this quasi-mystical, hermetic process occurring, nor any perceivable change observable or conscious to you. Sorry, but that's the way you communication the correct choice by overcoming Public Health Risk Challenges. Thank you for saving Grandma.

Grandma doesn't a give a flying hoot about anymore saving. Because as cutting-edge scientific research presently postulates: inducing a stress reaction on a subatomic, microsecond measure and scale inside a sterile, electrically balanced and hermetically sealed chamber (formed by your blood brain barrier) opens up an infinite world of possibilities.

Paradoxically, not for your wellbeing or betterment in any way. Worlds of possibility fade away, like a dream long forgotten yet you'll probably still wish you were here.

Grandma said that sounds stupid and you're a dummy!

Life-Long, Well-Being Nudging of Targeted Individuals

above is a screen-shot of an example of telepathy via Technomancy.
I returned the above search results when double-checking a dictionary definition of "paradoxical." Completely unintended or anticipated in any way whatsoever. Grandma.

Ok this is the last stretch. And some forewarning is warranted: this section is dissident, esoteric, experimental to a degree that no words exist for accurate description yet. Ab-Thesis.

7th November 2022, 3:05pm

Deeply focusing on the last chunk of the COSSI Webinar: Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccination, finally completing an entire transcription of it. I had to take a break as the only male guest speaker, Associate Professor James Wood, stutters, umms, ahhs, errrs constantly. He even accidentally emits a Freudian slip when he accidentally said the word "Courage," instead of "coverage."

Trying to focus on accuracy as much as possible with my hearing, cognition-activating neural instruction which translates spoken words as a communication into gestural hand movements then recording the communication language. Reduce playback speed or rewind back seconds at a time because he's such a wreck at communicating effectively. An intense brain drain indeed and I was already very tired.

The natural flow of reading a script or prompt (in this case it was mostly powerpoint slides), to then processing it into spoken words. Then cognitively engaging speech functions to your webinar attendees for Public Health Communication Challenge purposes is so stilted, so unnatural and interrupted, that the driving purpose of communication presupposes its own failure. The challenge caused communication malformations and witnessing a changed nature of language disturbed me greatly.

I love language and communication so much that I'm lucky I didn't undergo malformation by witnessing it, and trying to describe the phenomena as accurately as possible.

During my smoke break on the balcony, I flicked on my cell phone and saw new push notification from Youtube app. It was of a video titled Digital ID and the Maori. The video is meant to explain New Zealand's proposed "Maori-Only" Digital ID system.
The researcher livestreams a recording of himself browsing the New Zealand's government information, on the New Zealand government website, while narrating to his audience what they are seeing. It then struck me that these attempts at narration were also malformed - distorted by challenges in taking in, to then understanding what he was looking at.

Additionally, there's another public health communication challenge threatening catastrophic miscommunication and disruption of a natural language flow. The additional hurdle was the government's Digital ID app is in Maori; it's name is in Maori language, it's in-app information displayed is in Maori language, it's specificity of terminology is tribally and culturally specific for traditional Maori familial, tribal and geographical terminology.

To cognate, then linguistically overcome colliding of languages could therefore further compound existing barriers for overcoming on the path to clear communication.

Compare this to Spartacus, of ICENI (Institute of Coronavirus Emergence Nonprofit Intelligence). In their podcasts there's no ums, no ers, no stuttering or microscopic gaps in delivery. No prevarication of optimal word selection or sentence structuring impeding natural flow. They used the most applicable and best choice from whatever selection of choices were presented at the time.

The effect of natural flow of language allows the overall construction to coalesce into a remarkable form. This makes weight. This imbues gravity and asserts authority. A corporeal presence is tangible and I explain it by acknowledging the importance of its text or podcast when considered in its' totality.

And currently in our late-stage crumbling decay of the Tower of Babel, our peripheral awareness is encroached upon by a seeping, acrid, cloying stench. It emanates from plumes then billows of the Library of Alexandria's Arson (coincidentally z-lib.org's domain was seized by the FBI and US DoG).

In times like this, when cogent and coherent, natural knowledge is annihilated en-masse, nor allowed to be real or barely given an environment to exist in, a voice like Spartacus' becomes immediately recognizable & a landmark. Recognition of canonical importance like this assists in reseeding, retaining and much needed reconstitution of our shared domain.

The first step to reclaiming any of our natural domains are recognition by rights.
The first responsibility is inspiring to lead ourselves into defending our knowledge, our wisdom, our perceptions and that our immediate understanding must remain ours, and not theirs to remotely control.

Conclusion

Consider that there's no difference between the NSW Premier during peak #plandemic malfeasance and treasonous actions and the times she spoke separate words which were then masterfully edited together.